Category Archives: Obama

That whole women’s rights/gender equality thing

img_5317

So the meme goes, “As long as you live, you’ll never see a photograph of 7 women signing legislation about what men can do with their reproductive organs.” And we all had a good chuckle at Trump’s expense.

I was really interested in this post for two reasons. Firstly, because it’s a bill diverting US funds away from countries like Mexico that perform many illegal and dangerous abortions using a pill called Misoprostol, also known as Mifeprex, which essentially causes the woman’s body to have uncontrollable contractions and can cause severe liver and kidney damage. Damage that is irreversible.

And secondly, because it’s just another tired meme the mainstream media influenced Liberal snowflakes are using to denigrate someone they clearly know nothing about. When your rights are being taken away, I’ll stand with you and protest, I promise you that. Until then, take the time to research, ask questions and figure things out for yourselves.

What the media fails to bring up is that this isn’t Trump’s bill. Ronald Reagan put the bill into action in 1984. Bill Clinton repealed it, George W. Bush reinstated it, and wouldn’t you know, Obama took it out again.

Women are going to have abortions if they want to. I fully support that right. But for the sake of their health, let’s try to get the procedures done by reputable doctors, not back alley hacks in impoverished countries.

 

5 Bold Predictions for a Donald Trump Presidency

Donald Trump
On the eve of his inauguration, we take a look at 5 bold predictions for Donald Trump in the first 100 days as president.

• With one day left for Obama to pardon Hillary Clinton for her email controversy, (which many suspect he won’t do, frankly because Obama never really cared for her), it sets up the possibility of Trump ordering his own inquiry into the scandal. Actual likelihood: 3/10

• Millions of Americans were tired of the status quo career politicians, and Trump is quite clearly the opposite of that. He also has a warm relationship with Putin, who many see as a key to conflicts in the Middle East. Where George W. Bush and Obama failed to reach resolution, the Putin lead, Trump assisted duo will succeed. Actual likelihood: 6/10

• This one is easy. Trump will impeach himself. He’s a loose cannon, make no bones about it. I’d like to hope that he’ll have enough support around him to ask questions and give the right answers, but he just doesn’t strike me as the type. Should this happen, the more reliable, less unpredictable Mike Pence would take over. Actual likelihood 5/10

• Earlier this morning, it was announced that a man with connections to the Clinton family had been held for questioning related to an assassination attempt on Trump during his inauguration. This one may not be so bold, since a vast majority of Pro-Democrat supporters wanted anyone but him in office. Actual likelihood: 5/10

• Trump will scrap Obamacare, or the Affordable Care Act as it is officially known. This could prove costly, and highly unsuccessful, but Republican’s control both the senate and the house of representatives, so any bill requiring a high approval rate could easily be pushed through. It’s likely that a Trump presidency will see the act repealed and repackaged. Actual likelihood: 7/10

The Devil is in the Details

rtr45r4s

It’s been said, that the devil’s greatest trick, was proving to mankind that he never existed. This is certainly true of Obama’s eight years in office. How he has managed to convince a vast majority of his best intentions remains a mystery.

As his last week in the oval office winds down, I’ll be pointing to some of the biggest mistakes he made while in office. If I’ve forgotten any, feel free to leave a comment and I’ll amend the list.

• Certainly his worst mistake was the day after the attacks on Benghazi in Libya. In the rose garden he stated the attacks were in retaliation for a video mocking Mohammed. In truth, the entire handling of the ousting and murder of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011 was poorly executed, and the fall out immeasurable.

• Guantánamo prison, at the very Eastern tip of Cuba, is infamous for it’s barbaric style torture techniques, including electrocution of inmates with car batteries and waterboarding. Both techniques condemned under the Geneva conventions, outlining proper standards for the humanitarian treatment in war. It was in 2008 that Obama brought forth the idea of closing this detention facility. And it was on January 22, 2009, his second day in office, that he issued an executive order, directing that the prison be shut down. Almost eight years later, it still remains open.

• Obama has authorized 506 drone strikes that killed 3,040 terrorists and 391 civilians (a large amount of them women and children), compared to just 50 issued by the previous president, George W. Bush.

• Obama’s regime has sold more weapons than any administration since World War II. The numbers are staggering, close to $50 billion in 2015, and another $45 billion in 2016. Another report issued states that sales to Saudi Arabia alone topped $115 billion while he was in office.

I’m sure I missed a few, but these stood out the most for me.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/01/04/heroes-benghazi-open-kelly-file-ahead-release-13-hours-secret-soldiers-benghazi

Russian Roulette

Happy New Year, and welcome back to Media Watch. We’ve taken a little break over the holidays, but now we’ve returned to deconstruct the media. Alternately, between posting days, you can also follow our Facebook page.

150929145850-mexico-obama-putin-2012-super-169

It’s a curious tale, this Russian hacking spectacle. The US are wont to believe the Russians are involved. It would solve all their problems. It would solve the DNC’s problems. It would solve poor John Podesta’s problems, and it would certainly solve Hillary’s problems.

But the catalyst of all this, is surely Obama, who pointed the gun squarely at the Russians, and pulled the trigger. Click. His statement of intent was clear when he said “These data thefts and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest levels of the Russian government.”

It isn’t his party come January 20th. He has created a sea of waves for Trump to calm, and that course of action must take place soon, or a new digital cold age might be upon us.

Cyber security expert Jeffrey Carr, author of Inside Cyber Warfare has stated that a joint report released by the FBI and Homeland Security, titled Grizzly Steppe “adds nothing to the call for evidence that the Russian government was responsible.” Top level security execs have also labelled it “Fatally flawed”, and “poorly done.”

But it was the US that interfered in 1996 to help Boris Yeltsin win. And it was Hillary who paid protesters to interfere in the Russian elections in 2008. We have short term memories, when it suits us.

The reality here, is that Putin has never liked Hillary, and never liked Obama. And the key to Middle East resolution is through Russia, so perhaps it’s not such a terrible idea that Trump and Putin get along.

 

The Election Hack

screen-shot-2016-11-14-at-2-07-50-pm
President Obama has ordered a “full review” of what the CIA is calling Russian hacking in an effort to influence 2016 election results and hopes to have results of the report before leaving office.

“The President has directed the intelligence community to conduct a full review of what happened during the 2016 election process” said Lisa Monaco, assistant to the president for homeland security and counter terrorism at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast meeting yesterday in Washington, D.C., yesterday.

“We may be in – crossed into a new threshold, and it is incumbent upon us to take stock of that, to review, to conduct some after-action, to understand what this means, what has happened and to impart those lessons learned and that’s what we’re go about doing”

The review, which was ordered earlier this week, will extend back t0 2008.

The intelligence community has firmly pointed a finger at Russia, but this ongoing review will look into potential hacks by “all foreign actors”, the White House has said.

POTUS Oversight

Obama must think the American people have short term memories.

During his two terms:
• He promised to close Guantanamo Bay Detention camp, a prison holding facility operated by the US Military. It still remains open.
• He was personally responsible for the approval of 423 drone strikes, killing up to 116 unarmed civilians and injuring close to 200 children
• His administration is to blame for mismanagement of the attacks on Benghazi that killed US Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.
• Operation Fast and Furious allowed more than 2,000 illegal firearms into the US by way of Mexico.
• 162 mass murders between 2009-2015, and 18 incidents involving 8 or more deaths, compared to 20 mass murders under the Bush administration.

Podesta emails part ii and the Presidential debate part iii

I was out for most of Wednesday night, and didn’t get home until well after midnight, missing the debates airing live. But a quick shower, some snacks (I like Doritos personally) and a couple of blankets (it was cold here, rained most of the day) before I queued it up on Youtube.

So strap in this is a long one..

Last night another selection of the Podesta emails was released. This time focusing on Obama, including a 2002 interaction where he encouraged the then member of the Illinois Senate to attend a disclosure meeting regarding Extra Terrestrials. Podesta, if you might remember seems to have an affinity for UFO talk, going so far as to persuade Hillary Clinton to advocate for the release of documents on Area 51.

Hard to believe, but that hasn’t been the strangest of interactions of this recent release.

In another email dated October 6th, 2008, sent between Podesta and Mike Froman (a transition adviser put in place as a top White House aide) with the subject line “Diversity”, sent a list containing names of women and minorities presented to serve as appointees for the incoming administration.

On the day of the 2008 Election, Podesta reached out again to set an emergency meeting of the G-20 to outline a plan for the ongoing global financial crisis. In it, during an an exchange with Barack Obama encouraged “On the chance that President Bush would raise this with you tonight, I wanted you to be aware that it is the unanimous recommendation for your advisors that you NOT attend”, outlining a list of pros and cons for the president-elect and suggestions on how he might decline any invitation from President Bush to the summit.

Advice included “early press availability following the election,” at which time there would “likely be a question about your potential attendance at the G-20 meeting.” Adding it was “something that such a question would elicit an interesting answer if asked.”

The interaction sent with suggestions on declining invitation also includes the line “The United States has only one President at a time, and until I take office in January that is President Bush.”

As you’ll remember, Obama was invited by Bush to attend the G-20 summit, and as advised, Obama declined invitation. “It is not appropriate for two people to show up at this meeting,” Podesta told reporters in 2008. “The resident-elect will respect  the fact that we have one president at a time.”

As discussed in Wednesday’s entry, I’d like to post a review of the most interesting Podesta emails, so far. They are as follows:

Violation of DNC charter?

In a January 2016 exchange between John Podesta and DNC chief Donna Brazile she stated her bias for the primary elections. “Technically, I’m neutral, but neutrality is something that gets you in trouble because, you ever notice someone who stands on the white line in the middle of the road? They get run over. And I don’t want to get run over. So I’m not neutral. I have to tell people that I’m neutral, but I’m ready for Hillary.”

This is interesting, because if true, Brazile is in direct violation of the DNC charter.

Bernie Sanders referred to as a “doofus”

In an exchange with Neera Tanden (a political activist, domestic policy adviser and President of the Centre for American Progress, a public policy research and advocacy organization in Washington, DC.) with in December 2015, regarding the Paris Climate Change Conference he referred to DNC candidate Bernie Sanders as a “doofus” for questioning the deal.

He recommended the campaign “make love to Bernie and his idealistic supporters, and co-opt as many of his progressive issues as possible.”

Also in a message to Podesta from Philip Munger , a leading donator to the Democratic Party, took a different approach. Munder suggested that Clinton is “going to have to kneecap him. She is going to have to take him down from his morally superior perch.”

Pay to Play?

In emails from February 2016 titled “speaking at the banks” Tanden suggests to Podesta that Clinton “should just return the money” if she “lose(s) badly.”

Further emails  between Podesta and Clinton aide Huma Abedin in January 2015 detail how Moroccan donations to Clinton Foundation’s Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) in exchange for access to Hillary.

Abedin suggests the “King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting” and that “the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter.”

She continues to say that the meeting had been Clinton’s idea. “Our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request,” Abedin adds. “She created this mess and she knows it.”

Clintons Won’t forget what their friends have done for them

In a November 2014 exchange, Clinton’s  2016 campaign manager Robby Mook emailed Podesta about moving the Illinois primary out of March, as it would be a “lifeline to a moderate Republican candidate.”

Although Illinois was offered “a bonus of 10% extra delegates if they move to April and 20% if they move to May,” the date didn’t change.

“They don’t really care about being helpful and feel forgotten and neglected by POTUS,” Mook writes. “The key point is that this is not an Obama ask, but a Hillary ask. And the Clintons won’t forget what their friends have done for them.”

Achille’s heel

In a further interaction between Podesta and Tanden, regarding Clinton’s shortcomings she states: ““Everyone wants her to apologize,” Tanden also say to Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s director of communications. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles heel. But she didn’t seem like a bitch in the interview. And she said the word sorry. She will get to a full apology in a few interviews.”

Presidential debate part iii

Some key points on the third Presidential debates, Hillary states that 33,000 people died in gun related shootings. It took a lot of digging to find, but according to the Gun Violence Archive the total amount of gun related deaths in 2015 is actually 13,472, Not 33,000. In fact, the past two years combined (2014’s total 12,579) still falls almost 7,000 shy of her estimate.

Hillary also suggested that 90% of donations to the Clinton Foundation go to charity. According to factcheck.org only 5.7% of their budget in 2014 went to charitable grants, “the rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and ‘other expenses.'”

Hillary states that $30 million was raised by the Clinton Foundation for Haiti. The total is much closer to $54 million according to the Wikipedia Clinton Bush Haiti Fund.

Hillary Clinton states that Charity Navigator has given her Clinton Foundation the highest rating (four stars). What she didn’t mention is her $2 million donation to the company, according Business Insider.

And finally Clinton complains that only Republicans are saying elections are rigged. Clearly she has a short term memory, since Al Gore (the Democratic candidate in 2000) during the election against George W Bush complained that Florida required a recount.

Political Discourse 2016

Friday morning I’ll be posting a review of the recently released John Podesta emails, including a selection of the ones I found most damning. But I wanted to share thoughts this morning on the election process and how interesting it was that Hillary had complained in 2008 about voter fraud in Pennsylvania (among other states).

Despite the fact that recently leaked Podesta emails show possible media collusion within DNC, paid actors being coached to ask specific questions for Hillary at townhall debates, that a moderator provided questions prior to the presidential debate, and proof that Bernie Sanders was never a legitimate Democratic candidate (documents show DNC were supporting Hillary as their candidate as early as May 2015), many voters have and will continue to vote for Hillary Clinton (or Donald Trump for that matter).

Which begs the question – is there an issue with the electoral system, or perhaps a problem with the perception of where to draw a line within the government as a whole?

Political discourse in teetering on the brink and neither big ticket candidate seems capable of legitimizing this election and that is perhaps the most polarizing fact of all. The two party system, and how it’s portrayed by mainstream media, is deeply flawed, if America feels they truly have no other options.

Shimon Peres, war criminal or ambassador of peace?

This mornings blog post is in regards to the life and death of former Israeli PM, Shimon Peres. And in particular, this Huffington Post article praising Trudeau for his posturing of pro Israeli in the current conflict with Palestine: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/09/30/justin-trudeau-shimon-peres-funeral_n_12273196.html

Firstly, let’s look at the facts.

Shimon Peres, died Wednesday morning, after suffering a stroke in Tel Aviv. He was 93 years old.

In 1963, he negotiated with John F. Kennedy to buy MIM-23 Hawk Surface-to-air anti aircraft missiles. It was the first set of dealings in ammunitions to the country by the US.

In 1994, after helping draft the Israel-Jordan Peace treaty, along with Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for talks that eventually produced the Oslo Accords, an agreement between the Israeli government and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which was signed in Washington, DC in 1993.

What isn’t being mentioned in all this, is that on April 18, 1996 his government led attacks on a refugee compound in Southern Lebanon that killed 106 and injured 116.

He was also a pioneer in bringing Israel into the nuclear age. Believed to be the only true Nuclear power in the Middle East. And in 1975, he signed and governed all aspects of the SECMENT agreement, a secret brokering between Israel and South Africa to arm both countries with nuclear weapons programs, that helped pave way to the Peres led invasion of Angola.

In 1997, he also helped Iran develop and modify Israeli built missiles so that they could have longer range capabilities beyond two hundred miles.

This was clearly not a man of peace. But none of this has been spoken about in mainstream media, who pro Israeli conglomerates have been praising with high regard.

Sources
_______________________________________________________________

http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/world/israel-middle-east/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/news/world/israel-middle-east/i-stopped-netanyahu-from-attacking-iran-extraordinary-claim-shimon-peres-ordered-published-after-his-death

http://mondoweiss.net/2016/09/shimon-peres-nuclear/

Morning musings: US Congress has voted to override a veto by Obama allowing families of the victims of 9/11 to sue the Saudi government: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/us/politics/senate-votes-to-override-obama-veto-on-9-11-victims-bill.html?_r=0

Canadian terror suspect was able to take a selfie with PM Trudeau: https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/09/29/canadian-suspect-in-terror-probe-took-selfie-with-justin-trudeau.html?campaign_id=A100

Mentally ill patient not criminally responsible for hammer attack: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/hammer-attack-not-criminally-responsible-jeff-weber-1.3779102

That whole Trump is like Hitler meme

This mornings article is in reference to this tweet: https://twitter.com/BrandMooreArt/status/780391058358280193 and also this one as well: https://twitter.com/mattgood/status/780412920689754112

I spend a lot of time on Twitter. Far more than I ever did on Facebook. And since joining in 2011, it’s been my go to for political news and updates from around the world. A veritable feed of any type of information I’m looking for from who won the Tigers game last night (12-0 Tigs over the Cleveland Indians), to Theo Walcott’s passing percentage v Chelsea (77%), to the amount of unarmed civilians Obama has droned since taking office (at least 314 since 2009).

But where there’s a wealth indisputable knowledge, there’s also conjecture and lunacy. There’s tightrope walking that fine line of Political Correctness that still allows hundreds of thousands of us a soapbox of our very own. And magazines like Medium to make sweeping statements that wind around and never really go anywhere.

As of this morning, I follow 604 different Twitter accounts. Most of them news conglomerates, politicians and a wide variety of graphic designers, whose posts help inspire me and see the design world from a different perspective. On Monday morning, a pair of tweets appeared in my timeline.

Firstly, this one:
092816a

It certainly caught my attention.

Hitler was a lot of things to a myriad of people. But no one can argue that with the help of German clothing designer Hugo Boss, he had an immense sense of style. The Feldgrau and Luftwaffe fashion is still part of every day wear over 80 years after. He also had some incredibly lofty ideas that made Germany a super power and a country feared by every neighbour within a one hundred mile radius of Berlin. The article, sadly, does nothing to prove it’s point for or against.

The second tweet, was by Canadian rock musician Matthew Good, someone I’ve known for well over 20 years, and whose politics have always been concise and well thought out yet, filled to the brim with a foreboding tinge that let’s you know exactly who he’s backing. Put mildly, he’s very Liberal.

092816b
I probably should’ve been more eloquent. I certainly could’ve been less biased as well. But what developed was an exchange over direct message that would compare former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to a war mongering sociopath, while mostly overlooking the atrocities carried out by this regime. My point was, that if you kill one person, or you kill over 300, you’re still a criminal. And since Trump, to the best of my knowledge has done neither, that sets him apart.

Trump is different. He’s not a politician. He’s not beholden to anyone. I’m not an American, so it’s irrelevant really, but given the opportunity I’d throw my vote away on Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, despite the fact that msm berated him for not knowing what Aleppo is.

That said, I can fully understand why someone would vote for Trump instead of a lying, conniving criminal like Hillary, who would likely sell out her own family and backstab her former cohorts at the State to have another chance of climbing those White House steps. She lied to congress, she covered up the planned kidnapping and eventual killing of an Ambassador, while her and Obama blamed it on a laughable propaganda film denouncing Mohammed.

Hitler had some truly terrible ideas when it came to ethnic cleansing, eugenics and racial purity. None of which I see in Trump. Frankly, Hillary’s win at all costs mentality is far more in line with the Third Reich, in my honest opinion.