Category Archives: Huma Abedin

Weinergate part ii

U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton talks to staff members, including aide Huma Abedin, onboard her campaign plane in White Plains
REUTERS/Brian Snyder

News broke this morning that documents found on a computer shared by Huma Abedin and her estranged husband Anthony Weiner contained close to 650,000 new emails allegedly in a folder marked “Life Insurance.” Rumoured to include the 33,000 Hillary deleted.

Potential blackmail against the Clintons, should Hillary choose to throw Abedin under the bus?

My understanding, is that the Clinton top aide has been put in a tight spot. And here’s why:

A) If she doesn’t cooperate with the FBI on the findings on this shared laptop, she’ll likely be implicated, including Espionage in sharing classified documents sent from her Yahoo email account, and printed out for Hillary.

B) If she divorces her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, he can be forced to testify against her.

Things get dicey, as the election looms. With just over a week to go in the elections, US 18 Code 2071 dictates that if found guilty, Hillary won’t be allowed to hold office in the United States government. Including, but not limited to President elect.

All in all, it should make for an interesting week ahead.

Weinergate part i

I must preface this entry by saying, that the follow topic is one I hoped I’d never have to read, and wished I didn’t have to write, but plan to talks about propaganda in the media with photos like Omran, the Aleppo boy will have to wait for a later time.

Late last night, news emerged that FBI director James Comey had sent a letter to congress to reopen the email scandal case against Hillary Clinton. Slowly news trickled out that her top aides Huma Abedin‘s former husband and Democratic congressman in New York Anthony Weiner was involved in another incident, this time, allegedly sending illicit text messages to a 15 year old girl in North Carolina.

Comey’s letter was to bring notice to the fact, that such emails may have improperly contained classified information, tightly controlled by the government. And while it’s unclear what was in the emails, which are still under review, or whether they had come from Mrs. Clinton’s server, his letter states that the documents “appear to be pertinent.”

As you may remember in his remarks, this reopens the case brought against Clinton, that saw her labeled as ‘extremelly careless’ in their handling of sensitive documents. That this has happened so close to election night, it has left the Clinton team, in the midst of a scandal of his own.

Clinton’s statement made in a news conference shortly after news got out was only to say “We are calling on the F.B.I. to release all the information it has.” Clearly upset that this information has been brought to light less than two weeks before the election. “Let’s get it out.”

Trump, as you might expected, reacted to the news by saying jubilantly at a rally in New Hampshire, “Perhaps, finally justice will be done.”

Part II on this developing case will be up Monday while news still trickles in.

Podesta emails part ii and the Presidential debate part iii

I was out for most of Wednesday night, and didn’t get home until well after midnight, missing the debates airing live. But a quick shower, some snacks (I like Doritos personally) and a couple of blankets (it was cold here, rained most of the day) before I queued it up on Youtube.

So strap in this is a long one..

Last night another selection of the Podesta emails was released. This time focusing on Obama, including a 2002 interaction where he encouraged the then member of the Illinois Senate to attend a disclosure meeting regarding Extra Terrestrials. Podesta, if you might remember seems to have an affinity for UFO talk, going so far as to persuade Hillary Clinton to advocate for the release of documents on Area 51.

Hard to believe, but that hasn’t been the strangest of interactions of this recent release.

In another email dated October 6th, 2008, sent between Podesta and Mike Froman (a transition adviser put in place as a top White House aide) with the subject line “Diversity”, sent a list containing names of women and minorities presented to serve as appointees for the incoming administration.

On the day of the 2008 Election, Podesta reached out again to set an emergency meeting of the G-20 to outline a plan for the ongoing global financial crisis. In it, during an an exchange with Barack Obama encouraged “On the chance that President Bush would raise this with you tonight, I wanted you to be aware that it is the unanimous recommendation for your advisors that you NOT attend”, outlining a list of pros and cons for the president-elect and suggestions on how he might decline any invitation from President Bush to the summit.

Advice included “early press availability following the election,” at which time there would “likely be a question about your potential attendance at the G-20 meeting.” Adding it was “something that such a question would elicit an interesting answer if asked.”

The interaction sent with suggestions on declining invitation also includes the line “The United States has only one President at a time, and until I take office in January that is President Bush.”

As you’ll remember, Obama was invited by Bush to attend the G-20 summit, and as advised, Obama declined invitation. “It is not appropriate for two people to show up at this meeting,” Podesta told reporters in 2008. “The resident-elect will respect  the fact that we have one president at a time.”

As discussed in Wednesday’s entry, I’d like to post a review of the most interesting Podesta emails, so far. They are as follows:

Violation of DNC charter?

In a January 2016 exchange between John Podesta and DNC chief Donna Brazile she stated her bias for the primary elections. “Technically, I’m neutral, but neutrality is something that gets you in trouble because, you ever notice someone who stands on the white line in the middle of the road? They get run over. And I don’t want to get run over. So I’m not neutral. I have to tell people that I’m neutral, but I’m ready for Hillary.”

This is interesting, because if true, Brazile is in direct violation of the DNC charter.

Bernie Sanders referred to as a “doofus”

In an exchange with Neera Tanden (a political activist, domestic policy adviser and President of the Centre for American Progress, a public policy research and advocacy organization in Washington, DC.) with in December 2015, regarding the Paris Climate Change Conference he referred to DNC candidate Bernie Sanders as a “doofus” for questioning the deal.

He recommended the campaign “make love to Bernie and his idealistic supporters, and co-opt as many of his progressive issues as possible.”

Also in a message to Podesta from Philip Munger , a leading donator to the Democratic Party, took a different approach. Munder suggested that Clinton is “going to have to kneecap him. She is going to have to take him down from his morally superior perch.”

Pay to Play?

In emails from February 2016 titled “speaking at the banks” Tanden suggests to Podesta that Clinton “should just return the money” if she “lose(s) badly.”

Further emails  between Podesta and Clinton aide Huma Abedin in January 2015 detail how Moroccan donations to Clinton Foundation’s Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) in exchange for access to Hillary.

Abedin suggests the “King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting” and that “the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter.”

She continues to say that the meeting had been Clinton’s idea. “Our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request,” Abedin adds. “She created this mess and she knows it.”

Clintons Won’t forget what their friends have done for them

In a November 2014 exchange, Clinton’s  2016 campaign manager Robby Mook emailed Podesta about moving the Illinois primary out of March, as it would be a “lifeline to a moderate Republican candidate.”

Although Illinois was offered “a bonus of 10% extra delegates if they move to April and 20% if they move to May,” the date didn’t change.

“They don’t really care about being helpful and feel forgotten and neglected by POTUS,” Mook writes. “The key point is that this is not an Obama ask, but a Hillary ask. And the Clintons won’t forget what their friends have done for them.”

Achille’s heel

In a further interaction between Podesta and Tanden, regarding Clinton’s shortcomings she states: ““Everyone wants her to apologize,” Tanden also say to Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s director of communications. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles heel. But she didn’t seem like a bitch in the interview. And she said the word sorry. She will get to a full apology in a few interviews.”

Presidential debate part iii

Some key points on the third Presidential debates, Hillary states that 33,000 people died in gun related shootings. It took a lot of digging to find, but according to the Gun Violence Archive the total amount of gun related deaths in 2015 is actually 13,472, Not 33,000. In fact, the past two years combined (2014’s total 12,579) still falls almost 7,000 shy of her estimate.

Hillary also suggested that 90% of donations to the Clinton Foundation go to charity. According to factcheck.org only 5.7% of their budget in 2014 went to charitable grants, “the rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and ‘other expenses.'”

Hillary states that $30 million was raised by the Clinton Foundation for Haiti. The total is much closer to $54 million according to the Wikipedia Clinton Bush Haiti Fund.

Hillary Clinton states that Charity Navigator has given her Clinton Foundation the highest rating (four stars). What she didn’t mention is her $2 million donation to the company, according Business Insider.

And finally Clinton complains that only Republicans are saying elections are rigged. Clearly she has a short term memory, since Al Gore (the Democratic candidate in 2000) during the election against George W Bush complained that Florida required a recount.